NUUK, GreenlandΒ βΒ President Trump retreated Wednesday from his most serious threats toward Denmark, easing transatlantic tensions and lifting Wall Street after rejecting the prospect he would use military force to annex Greenland, a Danish territory and the worldβs largest island.
Instead, the United States struck a βframeworkβ agreement in talks with NATOβs secretary general regarding the future of Greenland, βand in fact, the whole Arctic region,β Trump wrote on social media. He did not immediately provide details on the contents of the plan.
The whiplash of developments followed weeks of escalating threats from the president to control Greenland by any means necessary β including by force, if left with no other choice.
Now, βthe militaryβs not on the table,β Trump told reporters at the economic forum in Switzerland, acknowledging sighs of relief throughout the room.
βI donβt think it will be necessary,β he said. βI really donβt. I think people are going to use better judgment.β
It was a turn of events that came as welcome news in Nuuk, where signs hang in storefronts and kitchen windows rejecting American imperialism.
βItβs difficult to say what are negotiating tactics, and what the foundation is for him saying all of this,β said Finn Meinel, an attorney born and raised in the Greenlandic capital. βIt could be that joint pressure from the EU and NATO countries has made an impact, as well as the economic numbers in the states. Maybe that has had an influence.β
President Trump speaks during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Wednesday.
(Evan Vucci / Associated Press)
In his speech at Davos, Trump took note of the market turmoil his threats against Greenland had caused entering the conference. Announcing the agreement framework on social media Wednesday, he said he would pause punitive tariffs planned against longstanding European allies that had refused to support his demands.
Prominent world leaders β including from Canada, France and the United Kingdom, among Washingtonβs closest allies β had warned earlier this week that Trumpβs militant threats against a fellow NATO member were ushering in a new era of global order accommodating a less reliable United States.
For years, Trump has called for U.S. ownership over Greenland due to its strategic position in the Arctic Circle, where ice melting due to climate change is making way for a new era of competition with Russia and China. An Arctic conflict, the president says, will require a robust U.S. presence there.
While the president rejects climate change and its perils as a hoax, he has embraced the opportunities that may come with the melting of Greenlandβs ice sheet, the worldβs largest after Antarctica, including the opening of new shipping lanes and defense positions.
The United States already enjoys broad freedom to deploy any defense assets it sees fit across the island, raising questions in Europe over Trumpβs fixation on outright sovereignty over the land.
βWe want a piece of ice for world protection, and they wonβt give it. Weβve never asked for anything else,β Trump said, addressing members of the NATO alliance.
βI donβt want to use force. I wonβt use force,β Trump said. But Europe still has a choice. βYou can say yes, and we will be very appreciative,β he continued, βor you can say no, and we will remember.β
-
Share via
The day before Trumpβs speech, allies warned about a βruptureβ in a global order in which the United States could be relied upon as a force of good. Canadaβs prime minister, Mark Carney, in a speech Tuesday characterized Trumpβs push to acquire Greenland as an example of why βthe old order is not coming back.β
Trump apparently took note of Carneyβs remarks, and told the crowd on Wednesday that Canada βshould be grateful.β
βBut they are not,β Trump said. βCanada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements.β
The president struck a similar tone with his demands for Greenland, repeatedly characterizing the United States as a βgreat powerβ compared with Denmark in its ability to protect the Arctic territory. At one point, he cited the American militaryβs role in World War II to justify his demands, telling the eastern Swiss audience that, βwithout us, youβd all be speaking German, or a little Japanese perhaps.β
It was a slight carried forward by the presidentβs treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, who derided Copenhagen for its decision to divest from U.S. treasuries. βDenmarkβs investment in U.S. treasury bonds like Denmark itself is irrelevant,β the secretary said.
In several instances, Trump framed the transatlantic alliance as one that benefits other countries more than the United States.
βWe will be with NATO 100%, but Iβm not sure they will be there for us,β Trump said. But NATO Secretary Gen. Mark Rutte responded to the concern in their meeting, noting that the allianceβs Article 5 commitment to joint defense has only been invoked once β by the United States, after the September 11th attacks. βLet me tell you: they will,β Rutte said.
But Trump expanded on his thinking over Greenland in his speech to the summit, describing his fixation on Greenland as βpsychological,β and questioning why the United States would come to the islandβs defense if its only investment was a licensing agreement.
βThereβs no sign of Denmark there. And I say that with great respect for Denmark, whose people I love, whose leaders are very good,β Trump said. βItβs the United States alone that can protect this giant, massive land β this giant piece of ice β develop it, and improve it, and make it so that itβs good for Europe, and safe for Europe, and good for us.β
California Gov. Gavin Newsom was among the people in the audience reacting to Trumpβs remarks in real time. The presidentβs speech, he told CNN afterward, was βremarkably boringβ and βremarkably insignificant.β
βHe was never going invade Greenland. It was never real,β Newsom said. βThat was always a fake.β
Wilner reported from Nuuk, Ceballos from Washington, D.C.