Review: ‘Polyamory made me feel like a teenager.’ One woman’s chaotic, sexy journey
Book Review
Saying Yes: My Adventures in Polyamory
By Natalie Davis
Skyhorse: 288 pages, $33
If you buy books linked on our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.org, whose fees support independent bookstores.
One night, Natalie Davis, a married woman who also has a married boyfriend, is enjoying a first date at a bar with yet another man. Heβs attractive and interesting, but as they talk she realizes they have something unexpected in common: Heβs just gone out on a successful first date with her boyfriendβs wife, Winnie.
Itβs an awkward situation even for a polyamorist.
Davisβ revealing memoir, βSaying Yes: My Adventures in Polyamory,β doesnβt shy away from such potential misfires. In this case, Davis is more amused than embarrassed, and soon cedes the new man to Winnie. βHe was nice enough,β she writes, βbut I did not feel the spark.β
In an authorβs note, Davis, a lawyer, says that she changed βall names and some characteristics,β compressed time frames and re-created dialogue. But, apart from those narrative liberties, she purports to be chronicling true events, in all their messiness.
Author Natalie Davis
(Courtesy of Natalie Davis)
The bookβs main thread is Davisβ journey from a conventional, mostly happy but imperfect marriage to a full-throated embrace of polyamory, a subject thatβs recently earned its share of cultural buzz. This account has no great literary merit, but itβs an undeniable page-turner with utility to anyone contemplating the lifestyle.
Polyamory, meaning βmany loves,β denotes a form of consensual, or ethical, nonmonogamy involving more than swinging or occasional hookups. It emphasizes relationships, not just sexual variety. Partners may be defined as primary or secondary or mere βcomets,β who swoop in occasionally. Metamours, the partners of partners, may become friends or remain anxious rivals. And polyamorists may be linked in intricate relationship structures, or polycules, whose contours change over time. Davisβ book makes sense of all this without being overly didactic.
The idea of openly pursuing multiple romantic interests isnβt itself particularly exotic. As Davis notes, single people commonly embrace βdating around,β or what our 1950s-era mothers termed βplaying the field.β As part of the search for the monogamous ideal, or an expression of anxiety about commitment, the practice is often time-limited. Polyamory is more permanent β a stable lifestyle flexible enough to accommodate instability and rupture.
Davis, to her credit, doesnβt sugarcoat just how difficult it can be, especially for those new to its often inchoate norms. Not everyone can shed jealousy, let alone manage βcompersion,β which entails rejoicing in a partnerβs happiness with someone else. Another issue is just how βoutβ to be, at work and elsewhere, about oneβs preferences; the Davises worry about how and when to break the news to their teenage son.
Salient to Davisβ particular story is her lack of early romantic and sexual experience. She fell into an exclusive relationship with her future husband, Eric, at 19. Itβs not surprising that there is a frantic, adolescent quality to her first ventures into the polyamorous dating pool, including bedding strangers, lying about her age and drinking to excess. βMore often than I would have expected,β she writes, βpolyamory made me feel like a teenager.β
None of this might have happened without the prodding of Eric, βextrovert, voyeur, risk-taker, kink appreciatorβ β and two-time adulterer. In each instance, despite her pain, Davis forgave him, trusting in the underlying strength of their bond. Sensing monogamy was not his jam, Davis agreed to try swinging. That meant going to sex clubs and looking online for couples who might be a fit for them both, a challenging endeavor β and just a waystation, it turned out, to something more ambitious.
With Davisβ uneasy acquiescence, Eric reconnected with the second of his adulterous lovers, a woman with whom his wife (unsurprisingly) never got along. βMy first year of polyamory was one of the worst years of my life,β Davis admits. Eric eventually moved on to other (in Davisβ view, far nicer) girlfriends, and welcomed them into their marital home, practicing βkitchen table polyamory.β In Davisβ description, he is devoid of jealousy, a generous soul always rooting on her efforts to find worthy secondary partners.
Davis, in contrast, struggled. Finding lovers was not a problem. She comes across as intensely sex-positive, easily orgasmic and devoid of any trauma or shame around sex. (Explicit passages underline those points.) But for a while, a new love β a mutual one β proves elusive.
Author Natalie Davis with husband, Eric.
(Courtesy of Natalie Davis)
Felix, whom she meets on a kink site, is a sexy dominant who thrills her but keeps canceling dates. Hank, from OkCupid, describes himself as βcompletely bloody insane.β He nevertheless becomes both her first real boyfriend and an object of obsession. The main problem is his tempestuous marriage. His wife, Sylvia, has boyfriends of her own but canβt abide Hankβs obvious passion for Davis. βI cringed at being a sacrificial pawn in their game of relationship chess,β Davis writes. But itβs hard not to sympathize with Sylvia too.
As Davis becomes a more experienced polyamorist, her satisfaction grows. She chooses more emotionally intelligent partners and finds more accepting metamours too. She and Eric attend gatherings β from a poly conference to a βkink campβ β in which strangers quickly become lovers and friends.
Per her author bio, Davis is now a force in the poly community, presenting workshops on polyamory and editing an online publication called βPolyamory Today.β Sheβs also described as living in the Washington, D.C., area with her βpartner and metamour.β Online research clarifies that the partner is still her husband, Eric, whose wandering eye started it all.
Klein is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia.