‘New evidence’ sends Jordan Chiles bronze medal case sent back to CAS
Jordan Chiles might be able to keep the bronze medal she won, then was stripped of, at the 2024 Paris Olympics after all.
On Jan. 23, Swiss Federal Supreme Court sent the U.S. gymnastβs case back to the Court of Arbitration for Sport to re-examine the matter βon the basis of an audio-visual recordingβ that could provide evidence in Chilesβ favor, the court said Thursday in a news release.
βThe Federal Supreme Court acknowledged that this new evidence may justify a modification of the contested award,β Switzerlandβs highest court stated. βIt referred the case back to the CAS for it to re-examine the situation, taking this new evidence into account.β
Chiles initially was deemed the fifth-place finisher in the womenβs floor exercise final on Aug. 5, 2024, but was bumped up to third place after a judging inquiry placed by U.S. coach Cecile Landi gave Chiles an extra tenth of a point.
The decision resulted in a viral moment on the medal stand, as Chiles and U.S. teammate and silver medalist Simone Biles bowed to gold medalist Rebeca Andrade of Brazil.
Days later, however, the CAS ruled that Landiβs inquiry was registered four seconds too late and that Chilesβ original score of 13.666 should be restored. That decision knocked the UCLA star back down to fifth place.
Chiles, with the support of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee and USA Gymnastics, filed an appeal of that ruling with Switzerlandβs Supreme Court in September 2024. Her appeal maintains that the CAS had refused to allow video evidence she feels would show that Landiβs inquiry was filed within the required time frame.
In its Thursday statement, the Swiss court acknowledged that the video could βlead to a modification of the contested award in favour of the applicants, since the CAS could consider, in the light of this audio-visual sequence, that the verbal inquiry made on behalf of Jordan Chiles had been made before the expiry of the regulatory one-minute time limit.
βThe Federal Supreme Court therefore partially overturns the contested award and refers the case back to the CAS for a new ruling, taking into account the probative value of the audio-visual recording in question.β
In a statement emailed to The Times on Thursday, the CAS agreed with the Swiss courtβs ruling that βnew evidence provided by the athlete after the CAS decision justifies a re-examination of the appeal.β
βDuring the Olympic Games, CAS renders sporting decisions in a demanding time frame,β the statement read. βCAS cannot reopen a closed procedure without the agreement of all Parties. Following the [Swiss Supreme Courtβs] decision, CAS can now ensure a thorough judicial review of the new evidence that has since been made available.β
Maurice M. Suh, one of the attorneys representing Chiles, issued a statement Thursday praising the decision.
βWe are delighted that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court has righted a wrong and given Jordan the chance she deserves to reclaim her bronze medal,β Suh said. β… We appreciate that Jordan will receive a full and fair opportunity to defend her bronze medal. She is ready to fight vigorously, and we look forward to helping her achieve that result.β