Column: Pay attention to the deficit, even if Trump wonβt
Americans could be forgiven if theyβre unaware that President Trump recently performed one of his most essential tasks and sent his annual budget request to Congress, though months late and stunningly incomplete.
After all, so much else has been dominating the news lately: the Mideast war that Trump promised not to start. Price rises heβd vowed to end. His repeated insults of Pope Leo XIV. His portraying himself as Jesus Christ, then lying about having done so. An incompetent attorney general to fire. And the presidentβs actual priorities β plans for a $400-million White House ballroom and a massive βTriumphal Archβ nearby!
Itβs a lot.
Once again, as in Trumpβs first term, the public and press are inattentive to the nationβs fiscal health relative to past years. But that reflects the presidentβs own disengagement with reconciling spending and revenue β this from a president many Americans voted for based on his purported prowess as a businessman. For decades back to Ronald Reaganβs time, so-called deficit wars in Washington were a big story. Now, even Republicans in Congress complain of Trumpβs absence from the fiscal fray as they struggle to belatedly finish this yearβs budget work that was due last fall, and to end a weeks-old partial government shutdown, before turning to the budget for the fiscal year starting Oct. 1.
Yet itβs worth paying attention to U.S. budgets even if Trump wonβt, for the sake of our children and grandchildren whoβll inherit the bills. In one document, a federal budget reflects the nationβs priorities. And these days, in the perennial guns-versus-butter debate, Trump has made his feelings all too plain.
βWeβre fighting wars,β he told a group at the White House on April Foolsβ Day. βWe canβt take care of day care β¦ Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things.β
Forget that Trump swore to end wars. Or that last year, long before he went to war against Iran, he cut $1 trillion over 10 years from Medicaid and other healthcare programs in his misnamed βOne Big Beautiful Bill.β
Yes, budgets can be boring, especially to a president with a famously short attention span. Trump and many of us Americans are distracted constantly by all the shiny objects he throws at the national consciousness by his words, acts and social media postings at all hours.
Yet the budgetary trend is clear to anyone bothering to look: As president, Trump is once again exacerbating the nationβs unsustainable course of piling up debt. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, among other credible sources, debt is now approaching the highest level in U.S. history, which was reached during World War II. It already surpasses the size of the entire economy and threatens higher borrowing costs and reduced investments.
For all the achievements Trump likes to claim β ending eight wars in a year! β hereβs one thatβs real: He is on a path to break his own record for the most debt in a single presidential term, $8.4 trillion in Trump 1.0, which was nearly double the increase under President Biden.
Need further proof of Trumpβs brazen mendacity? Of course you donβt, but here it is: In the face of the well-documented budget record, Trump declared both this year and last year to a joint session of Congress, on national television, that he would balance the federal budget ββovernight,β he said in February.
The inequitable tax cuts and big spending increases for the military and immigration crackdowns that Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress enacted last year are significantly greater than in his first term, and are driving up the debt despite Republicansβ deep healthcare cuts. Just months after Trump took office, the ratings firm Moodyβs downgraded the nationβs sterling credit rating for the first time in more than a century.
And now, in his new budget request, Trump seeks to inflate military spending from under $1 trillion when he regained office to $1.5 trillion, for the biggest year-to-year increase in military budgets since World War II.
This fiscal irresponsibility is happening at the worst possible time. For the last quarter of the 20th century, presidents and Congresses of both parties annually debated how to reduce deficits and several times reached consequential multi-year deals, culminating during the second Clinton term in four straight years of surpluses. (Those surpluses ended β wait for it β with Republicansβ tax cuts and war spending during the George W. Bush administration.)
Politicians back then were moved not just by the deficits of their time β deficits that, as a share of the economy, were less than half what they are now. They also were responding to expertsβ warnings of a demographic tsunami by the 2020s: With the aging of the huge baby-boomer population, spending for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid would greatly increase even as the workforce whose payroll taxes support those programs shrank. Today the number of people 65 or older is almost three times what it was 50 years ago, and rising.
This reckoning is upon us, though you wouldnβt know it as Trump keeps calling for cutting revenue and spending more for lawless wars, immigration raids and monuments to himself. Barring bipartisan action, in 2033 Social Securityβs retirement fund and Medicareβs hospital fund will no longer be able to cover beneficiariesβ full claims, according to their trusteesβ annual report, necessitating reduced benefits or shifts of money from other worthy programs.
Trump did put Vice President JD Vance in charge of a βwar on fraud.β But that holds about as much promise as Elon Muskβs fiscal fiasco β remember DOGE? β that cost money instead of cutting $2 trillion as promised.
Like other problems, Trump likely will leave the fiscal follies to his successor, who, should he or she win two terms, would preside as Social Security and Medicare become insolvent. Iβve yet to hear any of the early 2028 presidential aspirants β or Trump β address or be asked about that.
Let the debate, belatedly, begin.
Bluesky: @jackiecalmes
Threads: @jkcalmes
X: @jackiekcalmes