Trump rails against Kimmel’s return to late-night show

Trump rails against Kimmel’s return to late-night show


The return of Jimmy Kimmel to ABCโ€™s airwaves flipped the political script, for a time aligning the late-night comedian with several conservative figures who staunchly disagree with federal regulators trying to shut him down over free speech โ€” even as President Trump continued to threaten the network.

โ€œI want to thank the people who donโ€™t support my show and what I believe, but support my right to share those beliefs anyway,โ€ Kimmel told viewers during his opening monologue Tuesday night.

Trump in recent days has ramped up efforts to stifle his political opposition and what he perceives to be liberal bias in media coverage through lawsuits and regulatory actions, a move that has increasingly concerned the presidentโ€™s supporters and influential conservative personalities.

The firestorm over free speech came in the wake of comments Kimmel made about how the โ€œMAGA gangโ€ was trying to score political points from Charlie Kirkโ€™s slaying. On a conservative podcast, Brendan Carr, a Trump loyalist who heads the Federal Communications Commission, accused Kimmel of โ€œthe sickest conductโ€ and suggested there could be regulatory consequences for local television stations whose programming did not serve the public interest.

After Disney took โ€œJimmy Kimmel Live!โ€ off the air at ABC last week, some high-profile Trump allies worried the threat of regulating speech was taking it too far โ€” and that conservatives could be next if the federal government were to follow through.

โ€œIf we embrace the FCC stripping licenses from anyone who says something you disagree with, the next Democrat president who gets in the White House will do this and will come after everyone right of center,โ€ Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a critic of Kimmelโ€™s, said Wednesday on his podcast, โ€œVerdict With Ted Cruz,โ€ reaffirming previous comments in which he likened Carrโ€™s threats to mafia-like maneuvers. โ€œThat is a slippery slope to oblivion.โ€

Trump, however, was dismayed by Kimmelโ€™s return and threatened legal action, following a pattern in which he has sued major media outlets over negative coverage of him.

โ€œI think we are going to test ABC out on this. Letโ€™s see how we do,โ€ Trump wrote late Tuesday on his social media platform, suggesting a lawsuit against the network could potentially lead to a โ€œlucrativeโ€ settlement. โ€œA true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad Ratings.โ€

Combined, Trumpโ€™s legal threats and Carrโ€™s comments have fueled a sharp debate about free speech, and whether Trump and Carr are trying to level the playing field for conservative voices or launching a coordinated and illegal attack to silence liberal ones. As a result, Carr โ€” the author of an FCC chapter in the right-wing Project 2025 playbook โ€” has landed in a glaring media spotlight and as the target of a congressional inquiry.

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and eight other Democratic senators wrote a letter to Carr on Wednesday expressing โ€œgrave concernโ€ over the FCCโ€™s apparent role in Kimmelโ€™s suspension, and demanded answers about the role the agency played in it and its justification.

โ€œThe FCCโ€™s regulatory authority over broadcast licenses was never intended to serve as a weapon to silence criticism or punish satirical commentary,โ€ the senators wrote. โ€œYour agencyโ€™s mission is to serve the public interest, not to act as an enforcement arm for political retribution against media outlets that displease those in power.โ€

California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta has also written to Carr, accusing the Trump administration of โ€œwaging a dangerous attack on those who dare to speak out against itโ€ and calling on Carr to recommit to defending free speech, including by disavowing his previous remarks about Kimmel.

In the days after Kimmel was sidelined, Cruz and other influential conservatives, who have long trashed the longtime late-night host, voiced opposition to his situation based on concerns that the FCC may be trying to regulate speech on the airwaves.

โ€œYou donโ€™t have to like what somebody says on TV to agree that the government shouldnโ€™t be getting involved here,โ€ former Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said on a social media post Monday.

Podcast host Joe Rogan said he did not โ€œthink the government should be involved, ever, in dictating what a comedian can or cannot say in a monologueโ€ โ€” and told conservatives they are โ€œcrazyโ€ if they donโ€™t think such tactics could be โ€œusedโ€ against them. Candace Owens, a far-right influencer, said Kimmelโ€™s suspension was an attack on free speech, and said she does not agree with the government controlling what can be said.

Ben Shapiro raised concerns about potential government overreach.

โ€œI donโ€™t want the FCC in the business of telling local affiliated that their licenses will be removed if they broadcast material that the FCC deems to be informationally false,โ€ Shapiro said, warning that โ€œone day the shoe will be on the other foot.โ€

Conservative podcaster Tucker Carlson said last week he does not want to see โ€œbad actorsโ€ use Kirkโ€™s killing as a means to restrict free speech, which he said is a cornerstone of Kirkโ€™s legacy.

โ€œYou hope a year from now, the turmoil weโ€™re seeing in the aftermath of his murder wonโ€™t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country,โ€ Carlson said.

In his opening monologue, Kimmel touched on the same theme. He said Carrโ€™s tactics were โ€œun-Americanโ€ and likened them to what happens in authoritarian countries such as Russia.

โ€œThis show is not important,โ€ he said. โ€œWhat is important is that we get to live in a country that allows us to have a show like this.โ€

On the podcast last week, Carr called Kimmelโ€™s remarks about Kirkโ€™s alleged shooter โ€œsome of the sickest conduct possible.โ€ He then said: โ€œFrankly, when you see stuff like this, we can do this the easy way or the hard way. There are ways to change conduct, to take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or thereโ€™s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.โ€

On Monday, Carr denied claims that he threatened to pull television stationsโ€™ licenses and that he played a role in Kimmelโ€™s suspension, saying โ€œthat didnโ€™t happen in any way, shape or form.โ€

โ€œTheyโ€™re completely misrepresenting the work of the FCC and what weโ€™ve been doing,โ€ he said during a conference in New York, accusing Democrats of engaging in a โ€œcampaign of projection and distortion.โ€

Carr said the FCC wants to empower local television station owners to โ€œpush back on national programmers, even when they think thereโ€™s some content that they donโ€™t think in their judgment โ€” not my judgment, but their judgment โ€” makes sense for the local communities.โ€

What happened with Kimmel, Carr said, is that local television stations โ€œfor the first time in a long time stood up and said, โ€˜We donโ€™t want to run that program, at least right now.โ€™โ€ He said Disney, a national programmer, then made its own business decision not to air Kimmel for a few days.

After Disney brought back the show, station owners Sinclair Broadcast Group and Nexstar Media Group said they would not be running it on their ABC affiliates, hinting to future conflicts that could play out in the media landscape.

Carr opened his Project 2025 chapter on the FCC by writing that the agency should โ€œpromote freedom of speech,โ€ but has also sided with Trump in criticizing broadcasters for allegedly showing bias against conservatives and said that he would use the agencyโ€™s power to ensure that they better serve the โ€œpublic interest.โ€

Bob Shrum, director of the USC Dornsife Center for the Political Future, said the political brawl over Kimmel has been interesting to watch โ€” in part because of the bipartisan backlash to the suspension and the administrationโ€™s apparent influence on it.

โ€œIโ€™m encouraged by the fact that itโ€™s not just Democrats who complained about this, itโ€™s Republicans like Ted Cruz,โ€ Shrum said. โ€œThat at least begins to set a deterrent for the federal government going too far on this.โ€

While Trump was angered by Kimmelโ€™s return, Shrum found it notable that his social media post ended with the line: โ€œLet Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad Ratings.โ€ It showed the limits the president sees on his power to wipe Kimmel from the airwaves, he said.

โ€œThatโ€™s not the kind of last line that says, โ€˜Weโ€™re coming after you,โ€™โ€ Shrum said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *